Bill O'Donnell New London
Publication: The Day
The real disappointment in this situation is that whatever contracts were drawn between Pfizer and the state/city apparently did not accommodate for the potential of a Pfizer departure. ("Bringing Pfizer to New London came at a heavy cost to taxpayers," Nov. 21.) There were no penalties, repayments, guarantees that property can't be donated to tax-free organizations, guarantees of property upkeep upon their departure and such.
Beth Sabilia's comments in this well-written article remind us that yes, this area of New London was in disrepair, and yes, this project has improved the area - thus the ultimate reason for using eminent domain as upheld by the Supreme Court.
If it were not for the protracted legal proceedings, this area would most likely have been developed, and our reactions to Pfizer's departure might now be much different.
With the Valentine's Day holiday approaching, we wanted to see if any of our readers ever received a Valentine's gift that was memorably bad.
With the Valentine's Day holiday approaching, we wanted to see if any of our readers ever received a Valentine's gift that was memorably bad.
In the past two weeks our Facebook fans have won tickets to the CT Tigers, Newport Winefest and Mystic Seaport. Become a fan of The Day on Facebook for access to these contests, breaking news, TheDay.com's best features and more!
HIDE COMMENTS
Fort Trumbull lawsuit likely the kiss of death
The real disappointment in this situation is that whatever contracts were drawn between Pfizer and the state/city apparently did not accommodate for the potential of a Pfizer departure. ("Bringing ...
HIDE COMMENTS