Login  /  Register  | 3 premium articles left before you must register.

A modest proposal: ban computer-generated effects in movies for a year

By Kristina Dorsey


Published May 13. 2014 1:36PM   Updated May 13. 2014 1:41PM

As I was watching a series of coming attractions recently, I was struck by how every release seemed to be just an amalgam of computer-generated special effects.

Buildings explode. Well, EVERYTHING explodes. Freaky creatures fly. Freaky creatures fight in the midst of ominous, otherworldly landscapes. It all feels like a glorified video game.

I don’t dislike effects simply because they’re effects. I dislike them because of how much they seem to fuel the vast majority of movies out there these days.

My proposal: Moviemakers go one year — yes, an entire year — without using any special effects.

Imagine. Films would have to rely solely on good storytelling and acting and directing.

I know what Hollywood studios would think: That’s insanity! All that visual craziness entices teenage boys — who are a loyal fan base — and a lot of foreign markets — which is an ever-expanding money source for us!

But I say, give it a try. It’s only a year. Let’s see how creativity can play out in ways that don’t involve CGI.

Would you support a one-year effects moratorium?




Day Photo Staff | On Assignment

David Collins | Today, in The Day

Karen Florin | On The Docket

Editors' Blog

Arts & Entertainment

Day staff | Taste Buds (Dining)

Jenna Cho | Salt to Taste

Jill Blanchette | Healthy Cooking

Kristina Dorsey | Reel Life

Marisa Nadolny | Pop Blog

Rick Koster | Aging Rock Dude

Sunday Night TV | Mad Men Monday

Just Listen | The Day's music writers share their playlists


Steve Fagin | The Great Outdoors

Vickie Fulkerson | High School Sports

Richard Cooke | Yawkey Way

Ned Griffen | High School Football

Gavin Keefe | UConn Men's Hoops

Clint L. Bramlett | The Real Mister Fantasy