Login  /  Register  | 3 premium articles left before you must register.

Joey "Jaws" Chestnut wins 8th hot-dog eating contest and gets the girl

Associated Press

Publication: theday.com

Published July 04. 2014 1:57PM   Updated July 04. 2014 2:02PM
Frank Franklin II/AP Photo
Seven-time hot dog eating champion, Joey Chestnut, poses while weighing in during a news conference to promote the upcoming Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot-Dog Eating Contest tomorrow Thursday, July 3, 2014, at City Hall in New York.Jo

NEW YORK (AP) — High-ranking chowhound Joey "Jaws" Chestnut dropped to one knee and proposed to his longtime girlfriend before Friday's annual hot dog eating contest, then packed away 61 franks and buns to hold onto his coveted mustard yellow winner's belt.

The San Jose, California, man fell far short of his record last year of 69 dogs and buns, but he still easily beat second-place finisher Matt Stonie, also of San Jose, who downed just 56.

Chestnut, 30, took a quick timeout before the annual Nathan's Famous Fourth of July Hot Dog Eating Contest at Coney Island to make it official with his longtime girlfriend, Neslie Ricasa, who is also a competitive eater.

In the women's division, defending champion Sonya "Black Widow" Thomas lost her title to Miki Sudo

Sudo, of Las Vegas, wolfed down 34 franks and buns. Thomas, of Alexandria, Virginia, was only able to devour 27 3/4.

Chestnut has won eight times in a row now. In 2010, his former rival, Takeru Kobayashi, Kobayashi refused to sign an exclusive contract with Major League Eating, the food equivalent of the NFL, and was banned from competition.

This year, the Japanese native nicknamed the Tsunami will compete against five other competitive eaters at a separate event on Fifth Avenue in a quest to down the most hot dogs without buns in 10 minutes.

News by Town

Most Recent Poll
Did the Supreme Court make the right call in its 5-4 Hobby Lobby ruling?
Yes, the court was right. Forcing the owners to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives they considered immoral violated their religious rights.
47%
No, this was a terrible ruling. Women employees shouldn't be denied coverage for contraceptives because they happen to work for people who object to them.
49%
I'm not sure how I feel. Both sides in the case make good points.
5%
Number of votes: 1922

No current items found