So-called buy-back program was a joke
Once again, the referees of karma have decided that New London becomes a laughing stock.
The March 3 article "Nothing but nice guys turning in guns at New London buy-back" was a perfect example of the uselessness of such feel-good strategies. Given the mindset of New London's good mayor, I'd guess he is lamenting the absence of free pony rides, hot dogs and milk shakes at this charade. How else will he explain the dearth of thugs and gang-bangers patiently standing in line to relinquish the tools of their trades?
And allow me to take issue with the terms we use to describe such events. Doesn't the term "buy-back" imply that the firearms obtained by the police and similar agencies were either owned or provided by them in the first place?
The on-going debates, emanating from last December's events in Newtown, are largely incomplete. We've been told, again and again, the official version of what happened that day. Have we been told the whole story of Sandy Hook?
Moreover, as a responsible citizen, I resent being lectured by hypocritical, attention-hungry politicians.
Stories that may interest you
Our brilliant governor and Democrat legislators think it will be a windfall to erect tolls on Connecticut highways. We are told that we will get $800 million from these tolls, and 30 percent of that will come from out-of-state drivers. What a wonderful way to get more money for our...
High traffic corridor roads need to generate revenue. Here is how. Trucks should pay tolls because their weight and speed damage road surfaces. Most truck traffic passes through the state, being the only means of transporting goods between New York and Boston. There is no rail...
As a frequent critic of the political primary system on this opinion page, I was happy to read Richard Cohen’s column, “It’s ridiculous that anyone...
Imagine walking into your place of business and being told by someone who turns up, ostensibly to give you his custom or to become your patient, that you must offer him services that violate your religious beliefs. He doesn't like your religion and doesn't value your First Amendment right...