Redevelopment plan for Seaside stinks
I have a few questions about the development proposal of the Seaside property in Waterford.
Are we stupid?
How many times will our officials fall for the developer's bait and switch tactics?
Since the original development criteria needed to include plans to save the historical buildings, and now that it is proposed that the buildings be razed, doesn't that put us back to square one for the usage of the land?
Is "preferred developer" a lifetime title?
Why is the state beholden to a developer who can't finance his own house?
Could I buy ocean front property from the state while my house is facing foreclosure?
Why are our local officials falling all over themselves to commercialize southern Waterford?
Does anyone else feel that this whole enterprise smells bad?
Stories that may interest you
The infrastructure of day care? It never ceases to amaze me how “infrastructure” is an excuse for digging a bottomless money pit in some people’s minds. First and foremost, the illustrious Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy and Rep. Joe Courtney are...
Robert Reich wrote an interesting column in The Day, “Republican claims about price increases don’t hold up,” (June 14). It made me take out my calculator. The...
The cartoon regarding Operation Warp Speed, (June 8), made me laugh. Well not really, because you would think, for all the credit Trump claims for COVID-19 vaccine development, he would be out there trying to convince...
The Day is retracting the June 11 commentary that was critical of the decision by the Mystic Aquarium to import beluga whales from Canada. The commentary was submitted by a purported animal rights activist and scientist. We sought to verify its authenticity by contacting the reported author, but...