To save our kids, arm our educators
The Day March 4 article, "Keeping students safe: Schools look at security in wake of Florida shooting," was a good summary of current deliberations, but it was all about reactive, defensive policies. That approach has gotten scores of students and their teachers killed and maimed.
The only ultimate defense against a determined shooter with assault weapons is a pro-active, offensive policy.
If all America had to offer during the half-century of Cold War was "Duck and Cover," we would all have been in gulags or in the after-life.
Only concealed-carry by some trained teachers and administrators will change the calculus in favor of the kids. And that means not scatter shot, but a head-shot to stop the trigger-finger.
Sorry, but that's the world we live in if you want to keep our next generation alive.
When I was in the Army Medical Corps, we physicians were given a choice: either a .45 hand-gun or a Carbine as our personal weapon to protect our patients in the field. Would I have used it? You bet!
Many civilians, like teachers and administrators, are reluctant to get into this. In fact, in the 1970s, I had trouble getting teachers to agree to have, and if necessary to use, Epi-Pens for their students who might need such care.
Well, your students need this care now. The lives you save may well be their lives and yours.
Stories that may interest you
Scenes of people in bars, on beaches, crowding streets, breathing all over each other, not wearing facemasks, make it clear that the national “reopening” surrenders our only defenses against COVID-19, which are behavioral; and accepts continuation of the uncontrolled spread of the...
It seems the president's bad behavior is influencing too many Americans to follow him by not wearing masks when sharing space with others. I was shopping at Big Y recently and tried hard to avoid several folks not wearing masks or pulling their masks down below their noses. Have Americans...
While trolling for votes during the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump asked, "What do you have to lose?" Fast forward to 2020, and the grim answer to that question is 100,000 deaths due to COVID-19. Unlike the sobering description offered by the New York Times that this mounting...
Reading all the news bits about the people who are refusing to wear a mask, some of whom go so far as to attack or even kill the innocent store employees who remind them of the store’s rule, I am bamboozled by the complete absence of logic or common sense. Why is it perfectly...