Support Local News.

At a moment of historic disruption and change with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the calls for social and racial justice and the upcoming local and national elections, there's never been more of a need for the kind of local, independent and unbiased journalism that The Day produces.
Please support our work by subscribing today.

Trump pulls the plug on "green" subsidies

Crony capitalism got a lump in its stocking from President Trump over Christmas.  

The president has at least temporarily defunded several so-called “clean” energy projects, including the Growing Renewable Energy and Efficiency Now (GREEN) Act, which provides incentives (read: taxpayer cash) to companies building offshore wind turbine farms. Which need these “incentives” precisely because they are energy inefficient.

The GREEN Act’s various incentives also include money for “environmental justice programs” at colleges and universities. Your tax dollars at make-work.

Its main sponsor, Democratic Rep. Mike Thompson of California, described all this as “a comprehensive approach to addressing the threat of climate change through our tax code.” Courtesy of the president’s pen, the GREEN Act’s “comprehensive approach” expired along with 2019.

Also kicked to the curb was an extension of the solar investment tax credit and the federal tax kickback of $7,500 to buyers of electric cars, funding for which likewise ran out with the calendar year. The EV kickback is considered by most industry experts to be crucial to the success of electric cars, which only sell when people are paid to buy them.

When Denmark rescinded its subsidies for electric cars, sales of electric cars collapsed by more than 60 percent.

Trump’s rescission of the EV subsidy here is likely to have a similar effect. Even for the affluent, who are the majority of EV buyers (precisely because EVs are expensive, even with all the subsidies) having to spend $7,500 more for an EV gives pause.

At least taxpayers will get a pause — and not only from having Elon Musk’s hands perpetually in their pockets. The rescission of incentives for energy-unproductive wind farms and solar boondoogles (Musk has his hand in that honey pot, too) will make their energy-inefficiency all the more obvious.

It’s hard to dig holes in the ground and fill them back up when there’s no more money for the shovels. The president just rescinded the shovel.

House Democrats could have gone to the mattresses and refused to agree to the $1.37 trillion spending deal finalized in December — thereby protecting their “investment.” As well as the investment in them, made by green campaign contributions.

But that would have resulted in a government shutdown just in time for Christmas. For which the Democrats would have had to take credit, annoying their base at just the moment when they need maximum political support for their effort to rescind the president, via impeachment.

It’s a tactical victory that could turn strategic for Republicans, unless the president's decision is rescinded and the subsidies restored. Trump's actions threaten not merely the investment in green alternatives but implicitly the premise justifying them as essential in order to stave off the climate crisis. It is supposed to be upon us by 2030, date certain. That’s now less than a decade away. With each passing year the crisis seems more hype than existential.

The longer action is delayed, the less necessary it becomes.

“It’s unfortunate the White House crushed ...” the various incentives for wind farms, solar power systems and electric cars, said Stephen Irvin of Amicus Solar, which is amicably inclined toward the incentives because it receives them. Amicus Solar will now have to try to find customers willing to spend their own green, rather than extracting green from unwilling taxpayers.

Much wailing and gnashing of teeth has resulted from the president’s actions and from what is perceived as the inept actions of House Democrats.

“They failed,” said the Sierra Club’s executive director, Michael Brune.

Trump’s actions are of a piece with his earlier actions — including his decision to pull the United States out of the Paris Climate Accords, which would have imposed crippling costs on Americans for the sake of affluent and politically connected crony capitalists like Musk and Irvin. By having the guts to question the existence of a climate crisis — and daring to touch what has become the fourth rail of American politics — President Trump may have just prevented an actual crisis: The implosion of the American economy.

Eric Peters is a political columnist whose work has been featured in The Washington Times, American Spectator, and The Washington Examiner. In addition to covering transportation and regulatory issues, he is a classic car enthusiast and the author of "Automotive Atrocities" and "Road Hogs." He wrote this for


Loading comments...
Hide Comments