Senate should act to fill court vacancy
The Republican-controlled U.S. Senate should not for political expediency shirk its constitutional responsibility. President Obama said he will nominate a candidate to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. The Constitution makes clear it is then the job of the Senate to provide its “Advice and Consent” by either affirming the nomination or rejecting it.
Instead, in highly politicized comments delivered just hours after the passing of Justice Scalia, Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky declared, “This vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”
Refusing to act on an Obama nomination would disenfranchise the 65,915,796 Americans who voted to re-elect the president and renew his power of appointment. If this vacancy occurred late in the president’s term, next August or September, perhaps McConnell’s position might have some validity. However, there is nearly a year left in the Obama presidency.
At what point, Mr. McConnell, does a president no longer deserve to have his nominations acted on? If a vacancy occurs halfway into a president’s second four-year term should the country have to wait two years to have a fully functioning court? Or perhaps as soon as Obama won re-election his power to appoint to the Supreme Court effectively ended.
Does that sound absurd? Well, so does McConnell’s position, a position unfortunately mirrored by Republican candidates running for president.
The nation needs a functioning Supreme Court. Take the case addressing the Affordable Care Act’s birth control mandate. Nonprofit and religious institutions are challenging the constitutionality of the requirement that employers provide their female employees with health insurance that includes no-cost access to certain forms of birth control. Some lower appellate courts upheld the requirement, while others ruled it unconstitutional. A 4-4 tie on the Supreme Court would leave the conflicting decisions standing, an outcome inviting legal confusion and chaos.
Given the political realities, President Obama should nominate a judicial moderate who received substantial Senate support from Republicans in his or her prior appointment to a federal bench seat. If Obama fails to do this, and Republicans conclude he is offering a justice far outside the judicial mainstream, they can withhold consent − but they should act.
In February 1988 — the last year of Republican President Reagan’s second term — the Senate unanimously approved the appointment of Justice Anthony Kennedy after the Democrats blocked Reagan’s first choice, ideologue Robert Bork.
That is how the system used to work and should again.
The Day editorial board meets regularly with political, business and community leaders and convenes weekly to formulate editorial viewpoints. It is composed of President and Publisher Tim Dwyer, Editorial Page Editor Paul Choiniere, Managing Editor Tim Cotter, Staff Writer Julia Bergman and retired deputy managing editor Lisa McGinley. However, only the publisher and editorial page editor are responsible for developing the editorial opinions. The board operates independently from the Day newsroom.
Stories that may interest you
"We are not at war. Sailors do not need to die. If we do not act now, we are failing to properly take care of our most trusted asset — our sailors," wrote Capt. Crozier.
Gov. Lamont, to his credit, has been careful not to abuse the authority he has to respond to the ongoing COVID-19 crisis.