U.S. policy hypocrisy evident in CIA torture
To the author of the letter, "CIA needs guidelines, congressional backing," (Dec. 27), and any others confused on the terrible legacy of torture left us by the CIA: We've already defined torture in U.S. law. We adopted and ratified the United Nations Convention Against Torture in 1994. Congress elaborated on the criminality of torture in 18 U.S.C. § 2340. And there is the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits (but does not define) cruel and unusual punishment.
The honorable Congress critters used their well-worn dictionary of weasel words to obfuscate and cloud some of the clear injunctions, but still, everything done by the CIA, as reported by the Senate committee, falls neatly into the realm of torture. Not enhanced interrogation but gross and consistent infliction of pain and suffering. Context has nothing to do with it, but hypocrisy, one of our leading exports, certainly does.
We practiced tortures that we have prosecuted after real war and condemned when used by other countries that could as legitimately claim "national security" as we did. So, it's not a question of Congress not clearly prohibiting torture, it's we as a nation allowing our representatives to turn a blind eye to it.
Shame on us.
Stories that may interest you
I read with pause the recent articles on the sexual harassment of Stonington High School female students by a teacher whom the kids complained about and who was allowed to retire from teaching with full benefits. My pause is two-fold. First, as the retired chair of the Committee on...
I would like to respond to the op-ed in Sunday’s edition, "Cities could benefit by backing Medicare for All,"(Jan. 19). The authors say that approach will...
As many are aware this is the weekend to celebrate the arts in the City of New London in conjunction with XLI Hygienic Art. Join in for the annual show that is an art exhibition like no other throughout the region with no judges, no jury, no entry fee and no censorship. Please be sure to...
Your headline on page one Jan. 18 was a perfect example of biased journalism and a glowing example of why so much of the public is losing faith in the media. It justifies the term fake news. The headline "Trump builds made-for-TV legal team" is an opinion, not front-page factual,...