There are rules for that
Regarding the article “State Democrats discuss filibuster, ‘calling the question’” (July 13), it appears members of the Connecticut legislature have found a way to circumvent their own by-laws and Robert’s Rules of Order. The Connecticut By-Laws call for Robert’s Rules to be the system for managing “order." Robert’s Rules acknowledges the need to allow debate and discussion but also maintain some reasonable limit on said debate. The process works if allowed. The question (bill) is on the floor being debated. A member “calls the question” and a vote is required. If the vote passes, a vote on the question (bill) occurs and a vote on the original question (bill) is taken. If the “call the question” fails, debate can continue. The legislative body therefore discloses its preference. It is inappropriate for either party to utilize some back-room decision to not "call the question." Such traditions are what impede the work of a legislative body. All legislators should/must follow the by-laws they agreed to uphold. Just do your job!
Stories that may interest you
U.S. Constitution, First Amendment, as ratified on Dec. 15, 1791: "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press." Yet we read, in a
James Haught's commentary, “Conservatives have always looked to stop social progress,” (July 25), is guilty of selecting which parts of history he wants to...
It was an interesting read of Dr. David Andersen’s Letter to the Editor, “Deny health coverage to COVID anti-vaxxers,” (July 26). The problem is that his letter is...
Dr. David Andersen, after submitting his Letter to the Editor, “Deny health coverage to COVID anti-vaxxers,” (July 26), should, in my opinion, be immediately stripped of...