Facts show government makes problems worse
When it comes to solving social and economic problems, the private sector invariably outperforms the public sector. In other words, private individuals, not government bureaucrats, are better at properly defining and fixing societal issues.
Take education. For decades, there has been a clear delineation between private sector education (home schooling, charter schools, parochial schools, etc.) and public sector education (government schools). Without a doubt, private sector education is superior to public education. Private school students consistently outpace their public-school peers. According to the Council for American Private Education, “Average ACT scores for 2015 graduates of private schools well exceeded the national average. The ACT mean composite score for 2015 private school graduates was 23.8, compared to 20.7 for public school graduates.”
Moreover, according to the National Center for Education Statistics (a government organization), “In grades 4 and 8 for both reading and mathematics, students in private schools achieved at higher levels than students in public schools. The average difference in school means ranged from almost 8 points for grade 4 mathematics, to about 18 points for grade 8 reading. The average differences were all statistically significant.”
Boatloads of studies show private school students routinely outclass public school students. This is especially remarkable because private schools do so with far fewer resources.
In 1979, the Department of Education was established “to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.” Unfortunately, the department has failed miserably in this mission.
Despite a budget of more than $68 billion and 4,000 employees, the Education Department has done little, if anything, to improve student achievement. According to the most recent results from the Nation’s Report Card, only 12 percent of 12th grade students scored at or above proficient in U.S. history. The results were not much better for science (22 percent), math (25 percent), and reading (37 percent).
On a comparative basis, students in the private sector are thriving. For instance, 55 percent and 44 percent of 8th grade students in Catholic schools scored at or above proficient in math and reading, respectively.
No doubt, there are many reasons for this gap. First, private schools do not possess huge centralized bureaucracies. These institutions largely operate independently, which allows them to be more responsive to individual needs and unique circumstances. Second, the private sector incorporates competition, which drives innovation. On the contrary, public schools are giant monopolies immune from competition.
Private citizens, unlike public servants, are generally more attuned to the intricacies of problems. Additionally, they have more skin in the game. Obviously, parents are inherently more concerned about their children’s educational attainment than bureaucrats. The incentive for private individuals to solve societal problems is much greater than distant (geographically and emotionally) bureaucrats.
This is true not just for education. It holds true for nearly every “problem” the government has tried to “solve.” Since the government declared the “war on poverty” in 1965, the poverty rate has remained stagnant. Since the “war on drugs” was launched in the 1970s, drug use has continued to increase.
By definition, the private sector is more flexible, responsive and agile than the public sector. On the other hand, the public sector is a bureaucratic leviathan unable to address the sophisticated nature of complex problems. Adversely, government exacerbates problems while creating new ones. We are all better off when the private sector, not government, addresses problems.
Chris Talgo is an editor at The Heartland Institute, a conservative public policy think tank. He wrote this for InsideSources.com.
Stories that may interest you
A fracking ban would not just harm families at the pump and at the meter, but for all the goods and services they buy.