Log In


Reset Password
  • MENU
    Op-Ed
    Monday, May 06, 2024

    Let armed college students protect themselves

    I still remember the classroom: the tile floors; the high ceilings; the tall, gothic windows. It was 1997 and I was a student at Virginia Tech. Ten years later, a deranged student would chain lock the doors and methodically shoot innocent students and professors in one of the worst massacres in U.S. history.

    But Virginia Tech was a gun-free zone.

    No, it wasn’t. It was — and remains — a pretend gun-free zone.

    A courtroom is a true gun-free zone. Every person who enters a courtroom must pass through a metal detector and have their belongings searched. Likewise, an airplane is a true gun free-zone. Each passenger must be examined by a body scanner. Every bag is searched. That is what it takes to make a true gun-free area. A sign on a window or a policy in a handbook does not create a gun-free zone, but it does create a helpless victim zone since rule-following people are apt to obey while law-breaking criminals are not.

    Nearly every mass shooting has occurred in pretend gun-free zones. Whether it’s a school, which is pretend gun-free by law, or a movie theater, which is pretend gun-free by a proprietor, the results are the same: good people become defenseless victims to law breakers, including terrorists and the mentally ill.

    Some have argued that arming more citizens would not stop potential attacks, but this is not supported by the evidence. When President Obama directed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to re-examine gun violence in America, the CDC reported back that guns are an effective crime deterrent and that defensive gun use by victims may outnumber offensive gun use by criminals. Just recently, a woman in Texas with a gun successfully defended herself from a man intent on robbing her at a gas station.

    Some people feel safer with tough gun laws, but feeling safe and being safe are two different things. The correlation between restrictive gun laws and murder rates is clear: the more of the one, the higher the other. The District of Columbia’s murder rate skyrocketed after its 1976 handgun ban and fell to historic lows after the ban was struck down in 2008 by the Supreme Court. Good people with guns don’t create crime, they stop it.

    And no one is more law-abiding than the average concealed-carry person. A 2010 study published in the Police Quarterly found that gun owners with concealed carry permits are even more law abiding than police officers. According to another study, those with concealed carry licenses are four times less likely to commit murder than the general population.

    In light of these facts, more schools have opened their doors to guns. Still, only nine states have laws protecting gun rights on college campuses and most states prohibit guns on campus.

    According to concealedcampus.org, more than 150 U.S. college campuses have allowed concealed carry for more than 1,500 combined semesters without a single resulting act of violence. Again, good people with guns do not commit crimes, they deter them.

    How can we prevent another tragedy like the one at Virginia Tech? Our only effective recourse to prevent or minimize future mass shootings is to arm as many good people as possible. Unfortunately, most college campuses are still pretend gun-free zones and so our nation’s students and faculty remain at greater risk.

    Daniel Howell is a professor of biology at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Va. He wrote this for InsideSources.com.

    Comment threads are monitored for 48 hours after publication and then closed.