Sailor shows courage in saying no to nukes

Why would anyone in his or her right mind agree to launch a nuclear weapon aimed at killing thousands or millions of people he or she does not personally know; fellow human beings who have parents, children and siblings who likely strive to live a decent life?

When asked in a psychological test administered by the Navy if he would launch such a missile if ordered to do so, Michael Izbicki, a conscientious objector, answered, "No."

I honestly ask, is this an unreasonable reply? Why do we so strongly adhere to a double standard, a standard that severely punishes those in civilian life who murder others but sanctions the possible genocide of countless numbers of other people via potential nuclear devastation?

Let us remember that the use of nuclear weapons and, to some extent, cluster bombs, land mines, unmanned drones and other diabolical human artifacts, poison our atmosphere and destroy our electromagnetic radio waves, our water supply and everything else we hold dear to our survival.

I salute Michael Izbicki for having the courage to lead the way in rejecting the deadly and childish premise that a nuclear strike on other sentient human beings is an intelligent, viable idea.

Hide Comments


Loading comments...
Hide Comments

Stories that may interest you

Investigate plot to bring down a president

The next two years may be two of the most fascinating in American history. Consider news reports that various top government figures appear to be involved in a conspiracy to remove a president from office through illegal means. There is truly an historic investigation, after a two-year...

Don't let complaining left suppress speech

It seems the liberals among us are becoming increasingly fragile, triggered by anything that isn't bracketed into their ideological views. The free exchange of ideas is the cornerstone of the First Amendment, but to the garden variety leftist this only seems to apply if those exchanges are...

Keep diversity of opinions on Day's pages

Me thinks the snowflakes protest too much! The Day should keep Lee Elci and a wider variety of other voices to have a diversity of opinion in its newspaper. The Day's editorial board is so reliably against any common sense financial or social conservatism that some sort of counterweight is...

Enjoys Elci and puzzles in The Day but not much else

As someone who finds this newspaper as vile as much of today’s journalism unfortunately is, I nonetheless continue to spend (way too much) money purchasing it. It is good to know one’s enemy. The articles contain obvious programming in what The Day wants readers to think and...