Sailor shows courage in saying no to nukes
Why would anyone in his or her right mind agree to launch a nuclear weapon aimed at killing thousands or millions of people he or she does not personally know; fellow human beings who have parents, children and siblings who likely strive to live a decent life?
When asked in a psychological test administered by the Navy if he would launch such a missile if ordered to do so, Michael Izbicki, a conscientious objector, answered, "No."
I honestly ask, is this an unreasonable reply? Why do we so strongly adhere to a double standard, a standard that severely punishes those in civilian life who murder others but sanctions the possible genocide of countless numbers of other people via potential nuclear devastation?
Let us remember that the use of nuclear weapons and, to some extent, cluster bombs, land mines, unmanned drones and other diabolical human artifacts, poison our atmosphere and destroy our electromagnetic radio waves, our water supply and everything else we hold dear to our survival.
I salute Michael Izbicki for having the courage to lead the way in rejecting the deadly and childish premise that a nuclear strike on other sentient human beings is an intelligent, viable idea.
Stories that may interest you
I cannot help but wonder how many people that have been tested and found to have a temperature over 100 and must therefore be considerd as having the COVID-19 virus? The human body will generate a temperature increase for many illnesses, such as for the large variety of bacteria that cause...
Not a word in the Aug. 4 Day honoring the 230th birthday of the United States Coast Guard. Alexander Hamilton started the Coast Guard in 1790 and the bill was signed by George Washington. We have a beautiful Academy in New London graduating many officers every year. Plans are being made...
The COVID-19 virus has lodged in the minds of our politicians − Republican, Democrat, independent and otherwise − resulting in some of the more idiotic decisions ever, one of which is this notion that we all have to vote by mail. If there is a way to make something more...
In a misplaced desire for ethical purity, Congress outlawed earmarks. They forgot that horse trading was a necessary part of reaching compromise. People always differ. People always think their motivations and positions are superior to their adversaries. Deals are needed. Earmarks...