Keep Groton RTM as fiscal watchdog

Although the upcoming election in November is primarily to elect a new governor and other state officials, Groton voters should be aware that there will also be an extremely important referendum question on their ballot. The question will be to approve or reject revisions to the Groton Charter.

Unfortunately, one of the revisions includes eliminating the Representative Town Meeting (RTM) form of government. This will drastically alter Groton’s government and take away voters’ representation and oversight processes.

The responsibilities of the RTM include reviewing, approving or amending budgets by the town council. The RTM also reviews, approves or rejects supplemental appropriations made by the council over $10,000.

The new charter revisions will replace the RTM with a seven-member finance board which, according to the new charter, “Shall support all fiscal (financial) decisions of the Town Council.” Thus, this change to a Board of Finance will take away the voter’s power, through their RTM representative to review and approve the town council’s budget on a line-by-line basis.

Doing away with the RTM is a huge mistake and will take away the voter’s say through their RTM representative.

Vote no for charter revisions.

James Streeter


Hide Comments


Loading comments...
Hide Comments

Stories that may interest you

Investigate plot to bring down a president

The next two years may be two of the most fascinating in American history. Consider news reports that various top government figures appear to be involved in a conspiracy to remove a president from office through illegal means. There is truly an historic investigation, after a two-year...

Don't let complaining left suppress speech

It seems the liberals among us are becoming increasingly fragile, triggered by anything that isn't bracketed into their ideological views. The free exchange of ideas is the cornerstone of the First Amendment, but to the garden variety leftist this only seems to apply if those exchanges are...

Keep diversity of opinions on Day's pages

Me thinks the snowflakes protest too much! The Day should keep Lee Elci and a wider variety of other voices to have a diversity of opinion in its newspaper. The Day's editorial board is so reliably against any common sense financial or social conservatism that some sort of counterweight is...

Enjoys Elci and puzzles in The Day but not much else

As someone who finds this newspaper as vile as much of today’s journalism unfortunately is, I nonetheless continue to spend (way too much) money purchasing it. It is good to know one’s enemy. The articles contain obvious programming in what The Day wants readers to think and...