Short-term vacation rentals present risk
In response to the July 5th editorial supporting short-term vacation rentals (STVRs) in single-family dwellings in residential districts: The benefits as represented are true. They provide more lodging options, boost the local economy and help defray home ownership costs.
However, the disadvantages include: reduction in homes available for permanent residency; unfair competition to licensed, taxpaying B&Bs, motels, hotels, and country inns; risk to quality of life from rowdy guests; increase in the level of caution for neighbors because of "outsiders" in the neighborhood; reduced desirability and value of adjacent homes; likely need for increased police and emergency 911 services; possible animosity between an STVR guest and homeowners or their children; and need for a purchaser or renter to consider the existence or potential existence of nearby STVRs when choosing a home.
A key disadvantage is a reduction in home values and corresponding tax revenues. What happens if one appeals the assessed value of a home based upon any of the above? Even if these events were rare, how would a Board of Assessment Appeals justify not reducing the assessed value? A legitimate justification for a reduction could be simply the existence of an abutting STVR. If you were seeking to purchase or rent, would you be willing to pay the same amount for a home that abuts an STVR as you would for an identical home that does not ? If not, then short-term vacation rentals in single-family dwellings in residential districts should not be allowed.
Stories that may interest you
Take President Trump, please. The Day cover, “Judge: McGahn must testify” (Nov. 26), on top of the photo “Surviving a tough spell” with speeling bee participants laughing away. Fitting,...
Regarding the editorial in The Day, "Problems cry out for new tourism approach" (Nov. 25): The state is holding back $200,000 representing two quarterly payments to our Eastern Regional...
After reading the front-page article “Wealth inequality an obstacle to tolling cars” (Dec. 3), I find it hard to believe that state Democrats are going ahead...
Fiddling while Rome burns. It's absolutely wonderful that State Treasurer Shawn Wooden wants to implement a virtue-signaling, wholly symbolic measure that divests gun and ammunition stocks from Connecticut's pension funds. But to the extent that this policy reduces returns to the pension fund by...