Better way to run a regional board
Regarding the editorial in The Day, "Problems cry out for new tourism approach" (Nov. 25): The state is holding back $200,000 representing two quarterly payments to our Eastern Regional Tourism District primarily because business is not getting done due to lack of a quorum at meetings, unfilled vacancies and poor attendance. The district is comprised of 41 towns, and each is supposed to have a representative on the board. Eleven towns have not even appointed anyone.
Some years back I worked with a similar quasi-government board comprised of 18 towns. Towns were required to have appointed representatives. The same problems were evident. It was fixed because sometimes money talks. Charter provisions were amended to allow a $100 stipend per meeting for attendance. This, coupled with some light refreshments, insured a quorum was present at every meeting. Sometimes it is just too much to ask of volunteers to make a continual commitment of time and effort with just a thank-you in return. The stipend would be a small fraction to pay to regain the many thousands being lost now. While the state is at it, they should also consider regional clusters to the board. How do you expect a 41-person board to conduct any meaningful business?
Stories that may interest you
I read with pause the recent articles on the sexual harassment of Stonington High School female students by a teacher whom the kids complained about and who was allowed to retire from teaching with full benefits. My pause is two-fold. First, as the retired chair of the Committee on...
I would like to respond to the op-ed in Sunday’s edition, "Cities could benefit by backing Medicare for All,"(Jan. 19). The authors say that approach will...
As many are aware this is the weekend to celebrate the arts in the City of New London in conjunction with XLI Hygienic Art. Join in for the annual show that is an art exhibition like no other throughout the region with no judges, no jury, no entry fee and no censorship. Please be sure to...
Your headline on page one Jan. 18 was a perfect example of biased journalism and a glowing example of why so much of the public is losing faith in the media. It justifies the term fake news. The headline "Trump builds made-for-TV legal team" is an opinion, not front-page factual,...