- 2016 Elections
- Special Reports
- Maps & Data
- Dear Abby
- Games & Puzzles
- Events & Exhibits
- Food & Drink
- Arts & Music
- Movies & TV
The following editorial appeared recently in The Washington Post.
There have been a few signs recently that obesity might not develop into the spectacular public-health crisis it seemed destined to become. It might just remain a huge public-health crisis.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported this month that the obesity rate dropped among younger, poor children in 19 states and territories between 2008 and 2011. The rate remained the same in 19 other states and in the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Only three states saw increases. (Not enough data were collected in 10 states.) No place saw its rate decline by more than a percentage point, but the results are still striking. Public-health advocates have worried for years that the United States was entering an age of obesity, the American waistline inexorably expanding and along with it the prevalence of diabetes, heart conditions, joint trouble, even cancer. Now it seems the country may be reaching a plateau.
But the country must do better than simply stand still. Medical costs related to adult obesity already cost the nation about $150 billion a year, not to mention loads of unquantifiable suffering. One in eight young children remains obese, and the numbers are worse among African Americans and Hispanics. Very often, the weight stays on.
The CDC could not pinpoint a trend or a policy that made the difference; that will take more research. But Laurence Grummer-Strawn, chief of the nutrition branch in the CDC's Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity said that the agency could offer its "best guess." The federal Women, Infant and Children (WIC) program, which offers food vouchers to poor families, changed the way it distributes its benefits to encourage the buying of fresh fruit rather than sugary fruit juice and of low-fat milk rather than whole milk. The CDC also points out that more mothers are breast-feeding and that public education and outreach have ticked up.
No matter how the policy debate unfolds, we would suggest eliminating economically irrational agriculture subsidies that favor crops such as corn. Health insurers should give their customers direct, financial incentives to take care of their bodies. Congress should think about how it might change the $75 billion food-stamp program to positively change some people's eating behavior.