Log In


Reset Password
  • MENU
    Op-Ed
    Tuesday, May 14, 2024

    Same simple, empty solutions won’t address heroin crisis

    On June 20, The Day published a guest commentary by Jim Spellman of Groton, “Stopping heroin at the source,” which contended that “two appropriate recommendations have been offered to counter the heroin crisis — treat it as an epidemic and counter it as a village.”

    Left unclear was who determined that these are the two appropriate recommendations in all of Connecticut.

    But, on his first point, I will agree that the heroin crisis in our state should be treated as an epidemic.

    However, the governor and officials in state government and local communities, like Groton, have not responded as if it is, in fact, an epidemic. There is no visible or palpable statewide sense of urgency or crisis about heroin. There is no rapid crisis response mode. There is no concrete plan to address the crisis. And there has been none.

    To date, I know of no town or city across Connecticut that has responded as if there is a heroin crisis. Instead, I only hear or read about lukewarm official announcements, such as Sen. Richard Blumenthal’s roundtables held across the state. There have been countless community meetings grounded in the same worn out sound bites and platitudes from the playbook of strategies and policies from America’s failed and wasteful, 45-year-old War on Drugs weltanschauung.

    “Just say No to Drugs”

    “More funds for drug education (DARE) and treatment/rehab programs”

    “More money for drug interdiction”

    The state is broke. There is no money for any new initiatives in Connecticut. And there is none forthcoming from the federal government that could address the speed of this crisis.

    On Spellman’s second point: “to counter it as a village” with suggestions of sanctions and military firebombing missions against heroin source regions (Colombia, Mexico, Afghanistan, remember the Andean Ridge initiative?) — I disagree with him.

    It is pure fantasy. It is the type of fanciful wishful thinking that worsens the heroin crisis here at home instead of addressing it responsibly, quickly and effectively. Put the blame elsewhere. It’s those people, not us. So, napalm them. And ask your president, senators and congressmen to do it or vote in someone else who will do it.

    Spellman quotes Chief of Police Leonard Campanello of Gloucester, Mass., who, faced with an overwhelming heroin crisis in his town, has publicly given up his law enforcement duties in favor of those of, essentially, a Chief of Social Work and Public Health. He has come to the realization (rightly so) that “we cannot arrest our way out of what is taking place with heroin, we must seek out, offer and provide means of treatment.” A good beginning and a smart pivot from the War on Drugs mentality, but it still falls short in a crisis.

    To face the heroin crisis, let us be open to all possible solutions, including accepting the fact that our Connecticut heroin dependent population cannot be forced or mandated to be sober and drug free. The reality is that there may be circumstances where heroin maintenance programs (yes, safe injection rooms offering pharmaceutical-grade heroin) and other more tolerant options may have to be considered and offered to end the crisis at a fiscally responsible price.

    The goal should be to avoid one more heroin overdose-related death, to go from 700-plus overdose deaths annually to zero.

    To our heroin-addicted brethren, let us offer Connecticut TEA: Tolerance, Empathy and Acceptance, as a way to end this crisis.

    Sylvester L. Salcedo is a retired lieutenant commander, having served in the U.S. Navy and Navy Reserve, including from 1996-1999 as commander of Joint Task Force 6 out of El Paso, Texas, working in support of Department of Defense and Department of Justice counter-narcotics programs. An attorney, he lives in Orange and can be reached at salcedo1898@gmail.com.

    Comment threads are monitored for 48 hours after publication and then closed.