Redevelopment plan for Seaside stinks
I have a few questions about the development proposal of the Seaside property in Waterford.
Are we stupid?
How many times will our officials fall for the developer's bait and switch tactics?
Since the original development criteria needed to include plans to save the historical buildings, and now that it is proposed that the buildings be razed, doesn't that put us back to square one for the usage of the land?
Is "preferred developer" a lifetime title?
Why is the state beholden to a developer who can't finance his own house?
Could I buy ocean front property from the state while my house is facing foreclosure?
Why are our local officials falling all over themselves to commercialize southern Waterford?
Does anyone else feel that this whole enterprise smells bad?
Stories that may interest you
Your editorial, "About that poem," (July 28), was a welcome, if somewhat equivocating, affirmation of the value of the First Amendment right to free speech. I do not mind poems about first love, but I have read and heard...
Come on, people! What are you thinking as you send me mocking glances because I am wearing a mask indoors − not that I go to many places, even now. Keep in mind that children under 12 have no access to vaccine protection, leaving them highly vulnerable to the virus and its...
In the July 29 Day, Jay Lustgarten's letter stated that the areas experiencing the highest growth rates are in Trump strongholds, "Paying the price for their vaccine ignorance". CDC data...
The number of persons crossing our southern border is at high levels. Just in the month of June 2021, there were approximately 134,000 apprehended and an...