Will Iran follow Trump’s lead in reneging on the nuclear deal?
This first appeared in the Los Angeles Times.
A year ago, President Donald Trump repudiated a painstakingly negotiated agreement under which Iran has placed significant limits on its nuclear program. The president confidently predicted that Iran’s leaders “are going to want to make a new and lasting deal, one that benefits all of Iran and the Iranian people.”
As he usually does, Trump exaggerated his prowess as a dealmaker. Not only has a new agreement failed to emerge, Iran’s president signaled this week that it might stop complying with some provisions of the one Trump besmirched, the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Iran and the other signatories to the deal continued to comply with it even after the U.S. withdrew. If Iran reneges now, Trump will bear a lot of the blame.
The accord slapped restrictions on Iran that were designed to prevent it from making atomic bombs. In exchange for Iran’s acquiescence, the United States and other countries lifted the economic sanctions they had imposed to deter Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Trump rashly rejected that trade-off, and his administration has sought to squeeze Iran with sanctions that could prompt Iran to abandon what’s left of the deal.
In a nationally televised speech on Wednesday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said that Iran would stockpile surplus-enriched uranium rather than sending it abroad, an aggressive step that he nevertheless claimed wouldn’t violate the deal. But he also threatened to restart production of bomb-grade uranium unless the European countries that signed the JCPOA guaranteed within 60 days that Iran would continue to “reap our benefits” under the accord — a promise that would be difficult to fulfill if they abided by the new U.S. sanctions.
In withdrawing the U.S. last year, Trump complained that it failed to address Iran’s development of ballistic missiles and did nothing to constrain Iran’s “destabilizing activities, including its support for terrorism.” He was correct, but supporters of the agreement noted that the U.S. could continue to punish Iran for its support for militant groups in the Middle East.
The administration continues to suggest that its goals are a new, more comprehensive agreement with Iran but some of the rhetoric sounds as if the ultimate goal is not a new agreement but regime change.
The Trump administration should be careful about undermining America’s allies and giving Iran an excuse to tear up the agreement and revive its quest to obtain a nuclear weapon.
The Day editorial board meets regularly with political, business and community leaders and convenes weekly to formulate editorial viewpoints. It is composed of President and Publisher Tim Dwyer, Editorial Page Editor Paul Choiniere, Managing Editor Tim Cotter, Staff Writer Julia Bergman and retired deputy managing editor Lisa McGinley. However, only the publisher and editorial page editor are responsible for developing the editorial opinions. The board operates independently from the Day newsroom.
Stories that may interest you
The Board of Education must show patience and, short of malfeasance or malpractice, give its superintendent every opportunity and the time to succeed.
The students' plan would go well beyond the modest gun-control measures such as expanded background checks and "red flag" laws that have been the focus of the current debate.
State must continue looking into port authority issues while doing due diligence on a potential megadeal for the future of State Pier.