Support Local News.

At a moment of historic disruption and change with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and the calls for social and racial justice, there's never been more of a need for the kind of local, independent and unbiased journalism that The Day produces.
Please support our work by subscribing today.

Call Trump's bluff on renaming military bases

This editorial appears on Bloomberg Opinion.

In yet another expression of lame-duck pique, President Donald Trump has threatened to veto the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act over provisions to rename military bases that honor Confederate generals. Trump is apparently calculating that lawmakers will capitulate rather than risk holding up $740 billion in funding for the military. Senate Republicans should prove him wrong.

The push to remove Confederate names from U.S. military bases gained momentum after last summer’s protests for racial justice. In both the House and Senate, bipartisan majorities passed versions of the NDAA that would begin the process of stripping Confederate names from 10 major Army bases — including Fort Benning (Georgia), Fort Bragg (North Carolina) and Fort Hood (Texas) — as well as from ships and streets on military installations. The House version also called for banning the display of the Confederate flag on military bases.

Trump vowed that he would “not even consider” renaming the bases. His defense secretary, Mark Esper, signaled openness to possible compromise, but any effort by the administration to work with Congress on the issue ended when Trump fired Esper on Nov. 9.

Congressional negotiators have made progress in reconciling their versions of the bill. Democrats have agreed to adopt the Senate’s three-year timetable for removing Confederate names, rather than the one-year deadline passed in the House. The bill now needs to be passed quickly. Among other things, it would give service members a 3% pay raise and provide added benefits for members of the military who assist with pandemic response. Because on-time funding is critical for military readiness, defense authorization bills have passed and been signed into law for 59 straight years. A presidential veto would bring that record to an ignominious end — but Congress shouldn’t back down.

On Dec. 1, the president added a new condition for his signature, insisting Congress include a measure unrelated to the military: repeal of the shield that protects companies from liability for user content online. The White House has suggested Trump might drop his opposition to renaming bases in exchange for the repeal, but Congress should resist.

Congress should pass the measure — and if Trump follows through on his threat, it should vote to override his veto.

The Day editorial board meets regularly with political, business and community leaders and convenes weekly to formulate editorial viewpoints. It is composed of President and Publisher Tim Dwyer, Editorial Page Editor Paul Choiniere, Managing Editor Izaskun E. Larrañeta, staff writer Julia Bergman and retired deputy managing editor Lisa McGinley. However, only the publisher and editorial page editor are responsible for developing the editorial opinions. The board operates independently from the Day newsroom.


Loading comments...
Hide Comments