Does Dan Vogel’s op-ed, “Government works best at local level,” (Sept. 9), use data corrected for the disadvantaged students educated in public schools in contrast to those wealthy enough to attend private schools?

Generally private school attendees start much higher on the education ladder with wealthier, better educated parents and associations. When a person doesn’t start the race until his competitors have already rounded the track once, what are the chances that runner will win the race?

How many students at private schools have housing or food security issues, are non-native English speakers, are from single-parent households or did not attend kindergarten classes?

My high school was a private school. Two schoolmates spoke something other than English as their first language, sons of wealthy high-ranking Guatemalan officials. I don’t believe either worried about their next meal or if the family was going to be evicted. Their problem was which resort to enjoy on Spring break.

Private schools generally reflect a disproportionate segment of wealthy families whose children start out with advantages not available to a substantial percentage of public school attendees.

The solution is more and better directed funding for the nation’s public schools.

Alex MacDonald

Waterford