Holy Affleck, Batman!

No, Ben, say it ain’t so!

I was chagrined, to say the least, when I heard that Ben Affleck had signed on to be the next Batman.

Way to undermine your renewed Hollywood cache, dude.

Affleck became the proverbial Toast of Tinseltown with his Oscar-winning, box-office-topping “Argo.” Everyone loved the movie. It was a huge financial success. It proved that Affleck really was a phenomenal director; his previous two films were not a fluke — far from it.

So why did he decide to become Bruce Wayne?

I mean, remember when Affleck played another superhero in “Daredevil”? Probably not, because it disappeared quickly.

He had progressed beyond that level of film. It feels as though Affleck is taking a step back by agreeing to play Batman.

And it’s not even as though he’s playing Batman in a Christopher Nolan film. He’s playing it in a Zach Snyder movie.

Fanboys think Batman is too good for Affleck. I, on the other hand, think Affleck is too good for Batman.

Ben, drop this flick and go direct another great drama.

What do you think of Ben Affleck playing Batman?


Reader Comments


The ups and downs of "Interstellar"

Some movies leave you with little to talk about afterward. Not "Interstellar." Christopher Nolan’s ambitious sci-fi epic is nothing if not thought-provoking, even though it’s wildly uneven as a work of art.

What about Bill? A look at Murray’s charmed career

Bill Murray might have carved out the perfect movie career. And it’s perfect in that it’s unexpected and quirky and always interesting. Like Murray himself.