Redevelopment plan for Seaside stinks
I have a few questions about the development proposal of the Seaside property in Waterford.
Are we stupid?
How many times will our officials fall for the developer's bait and switch tactics?
Since the original development criteria needed to include plans to save the historical buildings, and now that it is proposed that the buildings be razed, doesn't that put us back to square one for the usage of the land?
Is "preferred developer" a lifetime title?
Why is the state beholden to a developer who can't finance his own house?
Could I buy ocean front property from the state while my house is facing foreclosure?
Why are our local officials falling all over themselves to commercialize southern Waterford?
Does anyone else feel that this whole enterprise smells bad?
Stories that may interest you
Kudos to the Greater Mystic Chamber of Commerce for the wonderful job they did with the 63rd Mystic Outdoor Art Festival. The Chamber team of Bruce Flax, Morgan Yandow, and Solveig Persson should be especially...
Connecticut has been governed by one-party rule for over a decade. Despite this nearly unchecked control, Connecticut Democrats have failed to fix the problems that have plagued us in nearly every category. Most expensive to live in, highest tax burden, lowest population growth, lowest job...
Everyone is familiar with the old expression, “common sense is not so common.” Unfortunately, this is all too true in city policy and government. New London is a great city with so much going for it. Yet one must ask; why are we not thriving? The answer I am afraid is...
The Bee and Thistle Inn in Old Lyme has been in existence for an untold numbers of years and has been a Connecticut treasure. It has drawn visitors worldwide for decades and has been the destination for travelers and tourists looking to enjoy its history, colonial charm, warmth, and...