Redevelopment plan for Seaside stinks
I have a few questions about the development proposal of the Seaside property in Waterford.
Are we stupid?
How many times will our officials fall for the developer's bait and switch tactics?
Since the original development criteria needed to include plans to save the historical buildings, and now that it is proposed that the buildings be razed, doesn't that put us back to square one for the usage of the land?
Is "preferred developer" a lifetime title?
Why is the state beholden to a developer who can't finance his own house?
Could I buy ocean front property from the state while my house is facing foreclosure?
Why are our local officials falling all over themselves to commercialize southern Waterford?
Does anyone else feel that this whole enterprise smells bad?
Stories that may interest you
Who is making the call on who can have the American Dream? I was in the Coast Guard and working on a ship in the 1980s where we were tasked with intercepting Haitians trying to reach U.S. shores in boats that were not very seaworthy and returning the Haitian families back to Haiti...
Twenty-seven states, including Connecticut, have legalized sports betting now or will shortly. This affords many people who have not engaged in gambling on sports the opportunity to enjoy this entertainment. Approximately 80% of Americans have gambled at some point in their lives. Between...
Please be more certain that your headlines accurately reflect the story's content. The article on the front page of the print edition, “
I wish to commend the East Lyme Republican Town Committee for endorsing Rose Ann Hardy for the selectmen's board, despite her long-time running as a Democrat. If only the nation understood listening to the other person's point of view, we would all benefit. At one point in my past, I served...