The following editorial appeared in the New York Daily News.
Nike’s marketing executives have laced up and jumped into the culture wars, embracing NFL pariah Colin Kaepernick in their latest ad campaign. More power to them, we say. But don’t pretend the $120 billion company is making anything but a business decision.
Some so-called conservatives, livid at the show of solidarity with a man who they think is protesting the national anthem — he’s not, and has said so a thousand times! — are throwing sneakers on bonfires in protest. (Protip: If you’re really that upset, donate them to Goodwill instead.)
Mind, you these are the very same people who celebrate corporate political speech and scorn boycotts of companies whose positions happen to align with their beliefs.
Meantime, some on the left who today celebrate Nike have wasted breath over many years claiming corporations don’t have First Amendment rights. Nonsense.
Welcome to the world we live in: Corporations glom onto causes. Often it’s purely to protect their interests; sometimes it’s to associate themselves with a position, with a patina of principle. But — spoiler — it’s always really about money.
And just as they speak with theirs, consumers can speak with ours. That’s how the game is played in a nation where everything, yes everything, is now political.
The Day editorial board meets regularly with political, business and community leaders and convenes weekly to formulate editorial viewpoints. It is composed of President and Publisher Tim Dwyer, Editorial Page Editor Paul Choiniere, Managing Editor Tim Cotter, Staff Writer Julia Bergman and retired deputy managing editor Lisa McGinley. However, only the publisher and editorial page editor are responsible for developing the editorial opinions. The board operates independently from the Day newsroom.
Stories that may interest you
The mayor remains convinced that consolidating most city offices, now scattered among City Hall and three other city-owned buildings, into a single rental space is the best long-term option.
Pay disparities are less the result of outright discrimination than many politicians suggest, and ensuring gender paycheck equity is more complicated than they typically let on.
We should be shocked that a president, in the year 2019, would stoop to such a racist approach to his political opponents, but we are beyond shock when it comes to this president.